Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Wikitrip

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was delete. Shanel 04:32, 22 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Wikitrip[edit]

Self-referential. Also, Wikipedia is not a dictionary....Scott⁵¹¹⁴ 19:47, 17 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

WikiTrip was not included and not meant to be seen as a dictionary entry. It is a term that is quickly gaining coinage in Brooklyn NY among people who spend too much time on Wikipedia. It is no different than documenting the history of any other slang term. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Lewisibrown (talk • contribs)

I've heard the phrase used and have used it myself. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 12.171.160.202 (talk • contribs)

Delete per nom. Neologism, non-notable. Please read WP:NOT. I restored nominator's text, which was deleted by Lewisibrown. Commentators please sign your edits with 4 tildes (~) and don't delete other editors entries! Slowmover 19:58, 17 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom. Eivind ^t ^@^c 09:52, 18 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nomination. --Xyzzyplugh 16:41, 18 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom, self-referential dicdef protologism. I'm also disappointed that it refers to taking a trip on a Wiki rather than a wiki making you trip. Esquizombi 01:01, 19 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete not even a particularly good neologism. Pengo 13:38, 21 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.