Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/WikiPic

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. –Juliancolton | ^Talk 00:37, 29 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

WikiPic[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

A non-notable image wiki. The article appears to be written by the creator of the site (who also removed a prod tag placed by another editor). While there are some citations used to claim notability, none of them appear to come from reliable sources (all blogs and the like). I couldn't turn up any other sourcing that would suggest that this appears to pass the notability standard for websites. Bfigura ^(talk) 06:22, 22 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as nominator, for the reasons above. --Bfigura ^(talk) 06:23, 22 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Defer - I'd give it a year or so to see how it gets on. Removing references to something that might be seen as a competitor could be controversial if it later turns out to have achieved some weight. Lets have a bit of goodwill. The links to media announcements make sense at an early stage.--Brunnian (talk) 09:20, 22 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: I can't find significant coverage for this website. Joe Chill (talk) 14:14, 22 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - per nom... in reply to Brunnian: Wikipedia is not a crystal ball... we should not keep an article based on the potential of future notability - we cover subjects that have already become notable. An article on this website can always be (re)created if and when notability can be established through reference to reliable sources. Blueboar (talk) 14:32, 22 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Zero evidence this passes WP:WEB Triplestop x3 22:31, 24 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.