Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Wiki'd

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. -- Cirt (talk) 03:09, 23 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Wiki'd[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Deprodded by article creator. Essentially, WP:MADEUP.-- Syrthiss (talk) 17:12, 16 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Gsearches return many false positives, but I was unable to find any coverage in reliable sources of the game. WP:MADEUP applies. Jujutacular ^T · C 19:38, 16 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Games-related deletion discussions. —Jujutacular ^T · C 19:38, 16 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete which is a shame because it seems like a fairly neat idea, but I can find no RSes. Hobit (talk) 02:39, 17 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. This game sounds very similar to 30 other similar games listed on my user page which have been deleted before. Delete per all of the AfDs referenced there. --Metropolitan90 (talk) 06:04, 17 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
I'm wondering how this differs from games like Wikipedia:Wiki_Game. How was this verified? Or should they be deleted as well? Corey (talk) 09:15, 19 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- How does it differ from Wikipedia:Wiki Game? Not much, as far as I can tell. With regard to verification of Wikipedia:Wiki Game, I don't think sources are really needed. People say that this is an activity that can be done while clicking through Wikipedia, and obviously it is possible to do, so a description of the game is basically self-proving. If people were making claims about how many people play it, or who invented it, or who is the most skillful player, those kinds of claims would need verification. But I'm satisfied with Wikipedia:Wiki Game that it's been around long enough that whenever other people write articles in the mainspace about this game, I can say that we already have this subject covered in the projectspace and we don't need an article about the 31st iteration of the game. --Metropolitan90 (talk) 03:44, 21 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - this is quite similar to Wikipedia Races, which is also under AFD at the moment. Either made up or original research. Claritas § 16:19, 19 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.