Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Wiimbledon

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Keep. Only delete argument seems to be under WP:IDONTLIKEIT CitiCat^♫ 02:46, 31 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Wiimbledon[edit]

Despite claims of coverage in mainstream media (see talk pages), I cannot see a reason on why is this necessary. Previous CSD request was turned down. SYSS Mouse (talk) 23:10, 25 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Weak keep seems to be getting attention, though no evident news sources. JJL (talk) 03:21, 26 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Weak Keep, there is coverage in reliable secondary sources, which means this meets the notability criteria. Lankiveil (talk) 12:19, 26 December 2007 (UTC).[reply]
Keep per JJL and Lankiveil. Smartyllama (talk) 18:45, 26 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
comment. Being on secondary source in this case, only shows this is newsworthly, not notability.. SYSS Mouse (talk) 04:20, 27 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
respons but something that has made so many news things is surely notable. Smartyllama (talk) 14:21, 27 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Merge to Wii sports, unless the size of this article grows considerably. cheers, Casliber (talk · contribs) 19:14, 28 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been added to the list of video game deletions. Someone another (talk) 16:52, 27 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.