Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Why the xbox 360 is better than the PS3
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the debate was: Delete Prodego talk 23:11, 5 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Why the xbox 360 is better than the PS3[edit]
Obvious POV issues and will always have POV, author claims it is based on Microsoft's research Metros232 16:52, 5 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete The title itself is POV. --Bachrach44 16:57, 5 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per nom. -- Scientizzle 17:03, 5 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per nom, and hopelessly POV. --Rindis 17:08, 5 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- i clearly put at the top of my article baised on microsofts research and put hargon at the top.--ahmed1212
- Delete this essay as per Wikipedia is not a publisher of original thought. --Allen3 talk 17:18, 5 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per above. This might be the most easily-decided AfD debate ever. -- Kicking222 17:20, 5 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Well, if the research is by Microsoft and "proven", it must be true..... Delete. -- MarcoTolo 17:40, 5 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- I have no idea why so many people are complaning when this research is gatherd form OTHER gaming sites and microsotf. It is NOT based on my personal opinion.--ahmed1212
- Comment We're not complaining. We're stating that this is not encyclopedic no matter who compiled this research. Metros232 17:52, 5 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per NPOV policy. -- Satori Son 17:54, 5 May 2006 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. Angus McLellan (Talk) 18:02, 5 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per nom, per violation of WP:NOR, and that's a damn lot of orphaned images after this article is gone. TheProject 19:04, 5 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Original research in the form of a personal essay. Wikipedia is not a gaming blog. --TheKoG (talk|contribs) 19:31, 5 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete POV. -Aabha (talk) 19:34, 5 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. Although a comparison could be made in a similar fashion as Comparison of handheld gaming consoles, the title is clearly POV. -- ReyBrujo 19:39, 5 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- As i have read most of your comments i will delete the page, change the title , keep the basic struture of the article, edit it to show the good and the bad points of the 2 consoles.i will make it as non-POV as possible and in a encyclopeic form. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Ahmed1212 (talk • contribs) .
- Delete as above. NPOV comparison of present-generation video consoles would be fine. ProhibitOnions 21:18, 5 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- if the specifications for the two are released then it is possible to do a comparinson between them.Ahmed1212
- Delete: Goes against WP:NPOV; bad title anyway. Better left asked at Yahoo! Answers. --Slgrandson 21:45, 5 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Subwayguy 22:12, 5 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per... you know, everyone. What does "hargon" mean? · rodii · 22:51, 5 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Oh, duh, "hangon"... so he has now created Xbox 360 and PS3 comparinson bad and good points and placed a pre-emptive hangon template... ? · rodii ·
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.