Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Why the english civil war broke out
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was Delete per WP:SNOW. Nick Dowling (talk) 22:47, 10 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Why the english civil war broke out[edit]
- Why the english civil war broke out (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
PROD was contested on the grounds that sources were added, but the lack of sources had nothing to do with the PROD nomination. This is a personal essay, and most of its content duplicates English Civil War. Delete. Blanchardb-Me•MyEars•MyMouth-timed 15:17, 10 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Look Mum, my school assignment is on Wikipedia. Seems that there is already an article about the English Civil War. You might want to contribute to the existing article. Mandsford (talk) 15:41, 10 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - Unsourced, O.R. essay. No doubt, anything useful here is already included in the main article on this war, but on the off chance that anything new can be verified, it can certainly be added in. ◄Zahakiel► 16:17, 10 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete as an OR essay. It's mostly redundant to the English Civil War article, but I'd go along with Zahakiel's suggestion as well. 1ForTheMoney (talk) 17:52, 10 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of History-related deletion discussions. -- the wub "?!" 17:55, 10 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - This isnt a questions and answers website , the reason why this broke out should be included in the english civil war article --B.C say what ? 17:59, 10 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per OR BusterD (talk) 19:04, 10 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per WP:OR and is redundant anyway. Wikipedia isn't a place to post your school work, No ifs, ands or buts about it either. Doc Strange (talk) 19:11, 10 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per the fact that Wikipedia isn't a place to post schoolwork; this is redundant to existing articles anyway. Ten Pound Hammer and his otters • (Broken clamshells•Otter chirps) 21:25, 10 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.