Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Whole value

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Redirect can be created editorially as desired. Daniel (talk) 00:37, 3 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Whole value[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

'Whole value' is no longer mentioned in Value (ethics) and Economic whole value is supported only by an external link to a non-reliable source. I have found no other articles that should be included, and no articles link to this page. Leschnei (talk) 19:05, 18 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Disambiguations-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 19:38, 18 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

comment The reference attached to justify economic whole value is actually for a software design pattern notion. Assuming that it holds up as such (there do seem to be likely reliable sources for that) and it's important enough, the article might be rewritten around that concept. Mangoe (talk) 21:10, 18 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 19:16, 25 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Delete this disambiguation page since there isn't any valid place to link to currently. As for the term as used in the external link [1] in a software engineering context, it's doubtful whether that concept is notable. In any case, we need not decide that question now. Our current "article" doesn't have any content about it anyway. Adumbrativus (talk) 08:32, 31 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect to Intrinsic value (ethics), which seems like it mentions something reasonably close. — Rhododendrites ^talk \\ 16:26, 31 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.