Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Who Will Rock You

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. — JJMC89(T·C) 01:11, 16 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Who Will Rock You[edit]

Who Will Rock You (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Inadequately sourced article about a web series. According to the strongest source here, this airs only on the sponsoring company's proprietary advertorial Roku/Amazon Fire app, not on a real television network, so it doesn't get an automatic free pass over WP:TVSHOW just because it exists -- but the sources are a one-off glancing namecheck of its existence in a Q&A interview with the sponsoring company's CEO, thus not an independent source; one piece of "local band does stuff" human interest coverage in the winning band's hometown newspaper, that wouldn't even clinch the band's notability under NMUSIC all by itself; and just one strong source that's actually about the show. This is not enough coverage to make something like this notable enough for a Wikipedia article. Bearcat (talk) 22:33, 8 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions. Bearcat (talk) 22:33, 8 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. Bearcat (talk) 22:33, 8 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the Article Rescue Squadron's list of content for rescue consideration. Dream Focus 00:53, 9 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete The best sourcing I can find is to the (already in the article) Billboard article, which appears to just be a moderately reworded press release. Even leaving it as counting, I can't find additional significant independent sources to satisfy WP:GNG. Der Wohltemperierte Fuchs talk 18:00, 15 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.