Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Whitney Ann Jenkins

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. MBisanz ^talk 21:42, 29 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Whitney Ann Jenkins[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

non notable author/creative professional, sourced entirely to hyper local sources and pay-to-publish blackhat sites like voyagela. Searching "Whitney Jenkins" and "Whitney Ann Jenkins" reveal a lot of mentions of people who aren't her and only 2 of her. Praxidicae (talk) 16:21, 21 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of West Virginia-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 18:11, 21 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 18:11, 21 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 18:11, 21 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 18:11, 21 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Virginia-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 18:13, 21 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 18:13, 21 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, there's no evidence of major television or film roles, neither do her recordings show signs of proven success. Insufficient independent significant news coverage to pass WP:GNG. Sionk (talk) 14:01, 23 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - This is clearly an attempt at promotion. She has been mentioned in a few reliable sources but they are always articles about something she merely appeared in. She has one local newspaper mention (currently footnote #13 in the article), but her works in general have not received the necessary level of reliable and significant media coverage. Everything else to be found is the usual industry directories and self-promotional sites. ---DOOMSDAYER520 (Talk|Contribs) 20:12, 24 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Keep This was not written for profit nor was it written for promotion. The sources are valid, and No Depression and Ink19 are not local publications, they are national brands independent of promotional content. Also, searching "Whitney Ann Jenkins" on Google brings up many pages that contain information about her. Bodhibear777 (talk) 01:56, 26 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete trivial work in film or other media. DGG ( talk ) 18:23, 28 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - run of the mill character actress; paid SPA and possible sockpuppet who should know better in 2020 - I can't assume good faith here. Bearian (talk) 15:10, 29 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Fails WP:NACTOR.4meter4 (talk) 20:49, 29 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.