Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Whitecaps FC Prospects
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep. no arguments for deletion aside from nominator JForget 01:16, 1 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Whitecaps FC Prospects[edit]
- Whitecaps FC Prospects (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log • AfD statistics)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Information out of date, program restructured Bribble (talk) 17:24, 16 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Oppose. This is a team which has competed at the same level as teams in the USL Premier Development League and National Premier Soccer League, and to delete it would cause a discrepancy with the histories of other teams in the league. The info being out of date is no reason to delete the page - recommend instead updating the information as much as possible, and retaining the article. --JonBroxton (talk) 18:11, 16 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: I noticed that the nominator has only made six WP edits, all related to deleting information from Vancouver Whitecaps development team pages. Not sure what's going on here, seems to have an agenda. --JonBroxton (talk) 18:14, 16 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Oppose. This is a team which has competed at the same level as teams in the USL Premier Development League and National Premier Soccer League, and to delete it would cause a discrepancy with the histories of other teams in the league. The info being out of date is no reason to delete the page - recommend instead updating the information as much as possible, and retaining the article. --JonBroxton (talk) 18:11, 16 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Football-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 17:35, 24 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. GiantSnowman 17:26, 31 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep as per JonBroxton, notable team. GiantSnowman 17:27, 31 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep as does seem notable. Arbitrarily0 (talk) 22:31, 31 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.