Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/White Rose cycle route

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Keep per WP:SNOW. Nominator Withdrew. (non-admin closure) L3X1 (distant write) 01:21, 17 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

White Rose cycle route[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

WITHDRAWN Non notable cycle route doesn't slot in under GEO notabilty guidelines L3X1 (distant write) 02:24, 15 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Keep: two dedicated publications seems ample coverage for notability. PamD 13:33, 15 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Geography-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 14:23, 15 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Transportation-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 14:23, 15 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Cycling-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 14:23, 15 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 14:23, 15 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Keep Plenty of references, and two books specifically covering this route.--Elmidae (talk · contribs) 14:22, 16 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]
withdrawn because I have learned that simlar articles and subjects are acceptable and notable. L3X1 (distant write) 22:53, 16 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.