Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/White Bat (album)

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to He Is Legend. As is typical for album articles found not to be independently notable ♠PMC(talk) 06:54, 17 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

White Bat (album)[edit]

White Bat (album) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Does not appear to meet WP:NALBUM, a search did not turn up enough in-depth reviews to pass that or WP:GNG. Currently sourced with a single independent review which is little more a blurb. The other sources are an advertising mag and Allmusic, and a promotional announcement. Onel5969 TT me 02:01, 23 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions. Onel5969 TT me 02:01, 23 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete per nom. Allmusic is not a reliable source in this case since it's just a track listing and user reviews. GhostDestroyer100 (talk) 15:58, 23 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep or merge - Article has plenty of sources. If the article can not be kept, this useful search term can be merged into He Is Legend. --Jax 0677 (talk) 04:12, 24 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep: Sources in the article (except AllMusic) seem reliable. I also found some reliable sources about the album: [1], [2], [3], [4], [5] and [6]. That said, the article is good enough to pass WP:NALBUM. ASTIG😎 (ICE TICE CUBE) 16:00, 26 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Comment - of the above refs, only a single one is a review of the album, from a niche publication. The others are about songs on the album, or from non-reliable sources. Onel5969 TT me 00:45, 31 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Missvain (talk) 03:57, 31 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, MBisanz talk 02:07, 8 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete or Redirect to He Is Legend. The best source that I could come up with is a review from Kerrang; the rest of the sources are unreliable and thus not sufficient for a standalone article. (talk) 11:01, 8 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Redirect to He Is Legend. Does not satisfy NALBUM. – DarkGlow () 11:59, 8 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.