Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/White & Sons
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 17:14, 13 November 2021 (UTC)
White & Sons[edit]
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- White & Sons (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Fails WP:NCORP, wikipedia is not a yellow pages. Govvy (talk) 10:59, 4 November 2021 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. AllyD (talk) 11:30, 4 November 2021 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions. AllyD (talk) 11:30, 4 November 2021 (UTC)
- Delete: This is a longstanding estate agency in its area and as such its transaction records have been deposited for use by researchers, but that is not in itself evidence of notability. There is indication of the company gaining silver medals in an industry award, but that falls under trivial coverage at WP:CORPDEPTH. My searches are not finding evidence of attained notability. AllyD (talk) 08:49, 10 November 2021 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. It's old, but that's about it. The article doesn't demonstrate GNG being met, and I don't find coverage. User:力 (powera, π, ν) 17:36, 12 November 2021 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.