Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/White2

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Mark Arsten (talk) 04:47, 30 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

White2[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Couldn't establish WP:NOTABILITY Boleyn (talk) 20:37, 21 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 14:25, 22 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 14:25, 22 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

allmusic & pitchfork reviews are in the article as nominated, tho one URL has now changed [1]. Have another look & consider withdrawing the nom. 78.19.9.121 (talk) 02:50, 23 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Keep per multiple reviews (Allmusic & Pitchfork); enough to meet WP:NALBUMS. Gong show 19:41, 25 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep, given how both last.fm and Rate Your Music show significant listener engagement, even though it if it has considerably less listens/ratings than their posterior work. The article itself seems well written. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 201.190.31.213 (talk) 21:43, 25 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep, the reviews at AMG and Pitchfork are enough to kick this over the WP:GNG in my opinion. Lankiveil ^{(speak to me)} 14:19, 29 January 2014 (UTC).[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.