Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Whitcomb, Washington

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. ✗plicit 03:03, 1 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Whitcomb, Washington[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This one is interesting because Whitcomb has been moved relatively recently. A 1963 topo shows it lying about a mile east of its current location, and a 1970 aerial shows why: the old roadbed is plainly visible arcing out into the river. The thing is, both locations were plainly just sidings; the older one appears to have been a water stop, and the new one has a string of rail maintenance buildings and a big radio tower. The only other thing else in the area besides water is the main spread of the Canoe Ridge Vineyard. SO not seeing keeping this one. Mangoe (talk) 02:34, 24 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Washington-related deletion discussions. ^{Engr. Smitty Werben} 14:35, 24 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Geography-related deletion discussions. ^{Engr. Smitty Werben} 14:36, 24 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom. –dlthewave ☎ 04:57, 26 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.