Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Whistle Pig (book)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Fritzpoll (talk) 16:37, 11 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Whistle Pig (book)[edit]

Non-notable book, fails Wikipedia:Notability (books) criteria. Jll (talk) 16:01, 6 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Weak keep It's still a book. I'm a sucker for books, especially children's books. If the author of the article could find a reliable third party source to establish notability that would be great. But if not... §FreeRangeFrog 18:39, 6 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Do you mean that your keep is conditional upon a reliable third party source being found to establish notability? Jll (talk) 14:46, 9 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete- I can find no coverage in reliable secondary sources. Reyk _YO! 19:39, 6 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. No evidence of meeting WP:BK. Doctorfluffy (robe and wizard hat) 21:30, 7 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Published in 2004, so libraries would have had a chance to buy it., But with 20 listings only in worldCat, it isn't even remotely notable.DGG (talk) 05:40, 9 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment I think this book has only been available for about a week. There is also a book called The Whistle Pig, written by Duck Miller and published in 2004. Jll (talk) 09:17, 9 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Keep per frog. Ikip (talk) 14:34, 9 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.