Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Whiskey (cat)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete all. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 21:09, 10 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Whiskey (cat)[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

The only claim to "fame" Whiskey has is being the world's oldest cat for a brief period of time. Does not pass WP:BIO (which is the closest Wikipedia has to notability guidelines for specific animals) and is only remotely notable for WP:1E which isn't even a particularly notable one (the cat who held the title before Whiskey doesn't have a page.) I am also nominating the following related pages because they are non-notable for the same reasons as Whiskey. Depending on the source, Tiffany Two didn't even hold the title of oldest cat, but rather second oldest. (Google information on her says that she was the oldest cat, but her page says second oldest and the dates on the List of oldest cats page reinforce this)

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

HAWTH OFF HEAD TALK 19:00, 3 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete all None of these cats are notable on their own, and are already included on the list of List of oldest cats.Donaldd23 (talk) 19:20, 3 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect all to List of oldest cats, where mentioned. Not notable. Hog Farm _Bacon 19:47, 3 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete I think, it doesn't seem to be notable enough to have an independent article; and its better to be deleted; at most to be merged. Ali Ahwazi (talk) 15:35, 4 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete all, per nom.--SilverTiger12 (talk) 14:40, 5 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete all per nom Spiderone 17:42, 5 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete all Wikipedia is not the Guiness Book of World Reccords.John Pack Lambert (talk) 20:08, 6 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Animal-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 13:17, 9 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.