Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/What.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Mark Arsten (talk) 01:04, 16 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

What.[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Shameless promotion of a future iTune release. No indication of notability - Altenmann >t 16:13, 8 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions. Jinkinson talk to me 16:20, 8 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Another (SPA?) editor offers in its defense that this page "is the only information available on [Mr. Burnham's project] at the moment," but that implies that there are no published sources outside Wikipedia to cite in the article -- which means it is unsourced and must be deleted. Dwpaul ^Talk 17:33, 8 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:35, 9 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

While there are no known sources yet from which to cite--and therefore its deletion may be justified--there is also ample indication of notability to suggest that this forthcoming album will have requisite sources, and its Wikipedia page will be completely validated as of its release date from Comedy Central records on December 17th. Comedy Central Records is a reputable company with a consistent history of accurate press-release, and in the event that this process of deletion last past December 17, the efforts put towards it will more than likely be reversed. User:Dr. Carey, D.D.S. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.34.170.66 (talk) 20:48, 10 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Please see WP:CRYSTAL. "All articles about anticipated events must be verifiable, and the subject matter must be of sufficiently wide interest that it would merit an article if the event had already occurred. It is appropriate to report discussion and arguments about the prospects for success of future proposals and projects or whether some development will occur, if discussion is properly referenced." While this show and album may prove to be popular, there is no evidence that it is widely anticipated, nor any evidence of popular discussion of it to cite. Wikipedia isn't intended as a medium for producers to stimulate this discussion, nor a venue for press releases. Dwpaul ^Talk 21:37, 10 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Appears to be WP:TOOSOON. We could even userfy it until it makes it big. ;) SarahStierch (talk) 04:15, 12 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.