Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/What's Up Mississauga (WUM Magazine)
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. -- PhantomSteve/talk|contribs\ 16:56, 3 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
What's Up Mississauga (WUM Magazine)[edit]
AfDs for this article:
- What's Up Mississauga (WUM Magazine) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log • AfD statistics)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Previous AFD from two days ago speedy closed after the author requested deletion. This entry was a duplicate, which I turned into a redirect, which is now an entry again. Same issues as first AFD, non-notable magazine, no sources, and a search for sources turns up little more than Facebook and Twitter. Hairhorn (talk) 01:12, 26 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of News-related deletion discussions. —• Gene93k (talk) 18:34, 27 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Ontario-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 18:35, 27 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Literature-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 18:35, 27 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete pre above reasoning, Sadads (talk) 20:11, 27 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
SpeedyDelete per Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/What's up Mississauga. Eagles 24/7 (C) 20:33, 27 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - No coverage in reliable sources. First issue is Oct 2010. -- Whpq (talk) 16:08, 29 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/What's up Mississauga. Spatulli (talk) 16:22, 29 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.