Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Wetlands conservation

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was redirect. (The information in this article is already covered by the Wetland article.) —Cleared as filed. 05:38, 19 November 2005 (UTC)

Wetlands conservation

Very little information -- it needs to be either be merged into a more general conservation article, Wetlands, or deleted entirely. Rob 18:49, 10 November 2005 (UTC)

• Delete Any conservation-related info should be part of the Wetlands article. Jasmol 20:20, 10 November 2005 (UTC)
• Merge and redirect into Wetlands rather than deleting. If someone links to "wetlands conservation" they should be sent to the article containing that information. AfD is not needed for this. Bryan 00:56, 11 November 2005 (UTC)
• If I'd know about this article two years ago, I could really have expanded it, but I forgot almost everything I learned in Geography on the matter. Merge and redirect to Wetlands until such time as a bright geography student can come and properly write this article in all its glory. Saberwyn 02:52, 11 November 2005 (UTC)
• Redirect to Wetlands per above. Merge and redirect if information can be verified. - Mgm|^(talk) 11:27, 11 November 2005 (UTC)
• delete nothing here worth keeping, redirect as above. Pete.Hurd 23:57, 14 November 2005 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.