Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Western Towboat Company

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. ♠PMC(talk) 20:11, 8 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Western Towboat Company[edit]

Western Towboat Company (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
  • Queried speedy delete as "This article may meet Wikipedia's criteria for speedy deletion as an article about a company, corporation or organization that does not credibly indicate the importance or significance of the subject. Note that educational institutions are not eligible under this criterion. See CSD A7.", but (ref article) "a fleet of 22 tugs and 7 barges" sounds to me like a substantially large waterfront work company. Anthony Appleyard (talk) 06:36, 30 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 04:33, 5 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Transportation-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 04:33, 5 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Washington-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 04:33, 5 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • Comment. Whatever the notability is, the article appears to be mostly copied from the company's About Us page. • Gene93k (talk) 04:36, 5 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete Fails WP:CORPDEPTH and GNG and as Gene93k says, it is a copyvio of this page. -- HighKing++ 11:39, 7 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete Available links and search results do little more than verify existence and contact information. No significant coverage in independent sources. Eggishorn (talk) (contrib) 18:15, 8 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.