Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/West Midlands Chambers of Commerce

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep DavidLeighEllis (talk) 01:42, 23 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

West Midlands Chambers of Commerce[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Pure promotional. Search only brought up organization websites. No mention in outside sources to establish notability Caffeyw (talk) 06:18, 17 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Weak keep - If the author can produce WP:RS then I guess it should be kept, but if not delete since sources now are all selfpublished. SefBau : msg 06:33, 17 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions. Northamerica1000^(talk) 15:51, 17 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. Northamerica1000^(talk) 15:51, 17 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. Northamerica1000^(talk) 15:51, 17 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. Northamerica1000^(talk) 15:51, 17 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Strong Keep -- The Chambers of Commerce are a leading business organisation, bringing together employers, mainly industrial ones. This article is about the regional level. I note that only one of the six members has an article at present, but that is perhaps a greater reason for keeping this. Peterkingiron (talk) 17:41, 17 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Then I strongly suggest is for you to look for independent secondary sources. SefBau : msg 17:45, 17 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Keep - As per coverage in this Express Star article. 86.136.93.185 (talk) 21:07, 22 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.