Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Wesley Gronowski

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. JForget 03:01, 6 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Wesley Gronowski[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Zero information on this author via Google news, Google books etc. No evidence that he or his books exist. pablo_hablo. 21:16, 27 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

note that this is a longterm unreferenced BLP, nominated here rather than PROD because of the spectacular paucity of sources. pablo_hablo. 22:23, 27 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Not listed at Library of Congress online catalog at http://catalog.loc.gov or British Library catalog at http://catalogue.bl.uk/ Eastmain (talk • contribs) 21:41, 27 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. -- (X! · talk) · @958 · 21:59, 27 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Crime-related deletion discussions. -- (X! · talk) · @958 · 21:59, 27 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete I was unable to even verify the existence of this person or his novels - much less their notability. --MelanieN (talk) 02:27, 28 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete No mentions on GNews/GScholar/GBooks, and Amazon don't have anything by him. WorldCat don't have any of their member libraries having anything written by him.I can't find an evidence of him or the boks at any reliable sources. -- PhantomSteve/talk|contribs\ 08:05, 28 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete A very successful HOAX. Congratulations to the single-purpose account for creating something that stayed up for almost three years. Up until now, nobody seems to have noticed that you didn't mention a publisher. Mandsford (talk) 16:16, 28 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Sure looks like a hoax. ‡ Himalayan ‡^ΨMonastery 00:24, 5 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, per all of the above. If Google doesn't know of him, he doesn't exist. C628 (talk) 19:14, 5 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.