Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Werster

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Lankiveil (speak to me) 12:36, 5 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Werster[edit]

Werster (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable gamer, reliable sources listed are about an event and do not mention this person. -- JamesMoose (talk) 17:54, 28 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of video game-related deletion discussions. (G·N·B·S·RS·Talk) • Gene93k (talk) 00:53, 29 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:53, 29 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:53, 29 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete. Does not seem notable. Custom WP:VG/RS Google searches don't turn up anything that looks relevant. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 06:01, 29 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete non-notable person. I was intending to A7 it, but the claim of world records it enough that I think we should let the AFD run its course. Callanecc (talkcontribslogs) 07:39, 29 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete Non-notable and no mention in sources.  7  09:37, 29 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete as non-notable person not passing WP:GNG with multiple reliable independent in-depth sources. The key point is "in-depth" rather than passing mentions in other content. Although I am familiar with their work and the importance in the niche field of video game speedrunning, there is no GNG-worthy coverage that I can find. —  HELLKNOWZ  ▎TALK 13:54, 29 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete - As an avid follower of many speedrunners and GDQ, I can't find this speedrunner to be notable enough to have an article; one of the only ones that has received enough significant media coverage would be Cosmo Wright. ☺ · Salvidrim! ·  14:34, 29 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete: the subject does not fall within Wikipedia's notability guidelines. Nick Pascal (talk) 21:34, 29 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete: no real coverage about Werster appearing in any reliable sources.AioftheStorm (talk) 03:20, 30 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  • Comment/suggestion: Perhaps a "list of notable speedrunners" (or livestreamers in general) should be made, similar to List of YouTube personalities. I'm not sure if there are any other speedrunner stubs/deleted articles that could be added to it, but it might be worth having as there are quite a few notable figures in the speedrunning community, and the community in general has been growing a lot in the past year or so. EvilHom3r (talk) 07:01, 1 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.