Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Wellington Carvalho

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy keep. Nomination withdrawn. (non-admin closure)‎ Dr vulpes ^{(💬 • 📝)} 02:40, 13 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Wellington Carvalho[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I tagged this article with a BLP PROD since as of this nomination it has zero references. @Simione001 asked that this be moved to AfD so here we are. I'm willing to withdraw this nomination if the article is improved to include at least two sources. Normally this kind of behavior at AfD isn't appropriate. We never hold articles hostage to improve them. But when it comes to living people we have a higher standard which includes citing sources for out claims. That's a really easy standard to pass and it matters. Dr vulpes ^{(💬 • 📝)} 09:32, 10 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople, Bibliographies, and Brazil. Dr vulpes ^{(💬 • 📝)} 09:32, 10 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Football-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 10:06, 10 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Keep on the basis of the references at the corresponding article in the Portuguese-language Wikipedia at https://pt.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wellington_Carvalho The nominator should have looked at the Portuguese-language article before making the nomination. Eastmain (talk • contribs) 10:09, 10 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 20:45, 10 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Keep as per above. Simione001 (talk) 23:12, 10 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - Per above. 200+ appearances in pro leagues with many sources... Article needs improvement, not deletion. @Dr vulpes:, I added three sources to the article, please withdraw nomination. Thanks, Das osmnezz (talk) 16:17, 11 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - sources added seem sufficient to pass WP:GNG. The Portuguese Wikipedia article also shows notability. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 19:58, 11 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Keep per sources above which show notability. Giant Snowman 18:47, 12 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Keep per above.Pharaoh of the Wizards (talk) 22:03, 12 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Has sources and now passes. Dr vulpes ^{(💬 • 📝)} 02:38, 13 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.