Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Well Oiled (album)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete all as far as the deletion discussion is concerned; all articles moved to the WP:INCUBATOR per rough consensus given. Note that I did not move them as subpages of Wikipedia:Article Incubator/Engine (boogie-rock band) because I don't think the Article Incubator deals with such subpages, i.e. they won't show up on the main WP:INCUBATOR page. Please let me know if I'm incorrect on that assumption. MuZemike 22:42, 9 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Well Oiled (album)[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I am also nominating the following related pages:

These articles are album and video releases by the band Engine. The WP article on Engine was moved to the article incubator following an AFD discussion. These related articles are unreferenced and have no independent assertions of notability. Suggest either deleting them or moving them to sub-pages of Wikipedia:Article Incubator/Engine (boogie-rock band), as incubation improvements to the Engine article may also establish notability for these releases. --Muchness (talk) 06:25, 25 November 2009 (UTC) Muchness (talk) 06:25, 25 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions. —J04n(talk page) 11:18, 25 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Tim Song (talk) 02:47, 2 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Comment: Per this discussion on my talk page, Engine's notability is established by this link and this link (screenshots of newspaper articles posted on Flickr). These albums, though, are not independently notable. I recommend moving them to the article incubator as well. When Wikipedia:Article Incubator/Engine (boogie-rock band) is moved back to the mainspace, these album articles can merged/redirected to the band article. Cunard (talk) 08:13, 3 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Move. Since there appears to be an active attempt to fix the parent article, I think it's a good idea to move subarticles there too and give them a chance to be worked upon until the main article is back and ready to be used as a place to merge to, should this be necessary. - Mgm|^(talk) 09:30, 3 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.