Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Welford Victoria F.C.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. пﮟოьεԻ 5 7 09:14, 19 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Welford Victoria F.C.[edit]

Article originally PROD'ed with the rationale "Village football team which has never played in the top ten levels of the English football league system or in a national cup competition, the usual benchmark of notability per the WP:FOOTY project. Zero Google News hits and no sources turned up by a more general Google search" but PROD was then removed by the article's creator with the edit summary "Don't understand reson for proposed deletion. Is it due to the use of protected templates? If so these can be removed.The article provides people with valuable information about a local football team". I therefore throw it open to the wider community ChrisTheDude (talk) 06:50, 14 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as not notable as per ~~WP:FOOTY/N~~ WP:N. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Dpmuk (talk • contribs) 11:25, 14 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- WP:FOOTY/N only covers player notability, so you may wish to come up with a different argument to use.......... -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 11:33, 14 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  - Good point. Was trying to be more specific rather than just WP:N and thought, from memory, that there were club guidelines on that page as well. Anyway WP:N will do. Dpmuk (talk) 12:17, 14 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom. Giant Snowman 12:34, 14 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football related deletions. Giant Snowman 12:35, 14 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - club does not meet any of the accepted notability criteria (playing at Step 10 or above, or competed in FA Cup or FA Vase). Bettia (rawr CRUSH!) 15:56, 18 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.