Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Weimar Economics
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the debate was delete consensus was that article in this essay form was not acceptable --W.marsh 20:03, 14 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Weimar Economics, German Inter-war Economy[edit]
Essay, see WP:NOR --NaconKantari e|t||c|m 23:11, 7 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per nom. Wikipedia isn't a junkyard. Ardenn 23:14, 7 February 2006 (UTC) Delete both. Ardenn[reply]
- Comment I added German Inter-war Economy because it is an exact copy of the first article. --NaconKantari e|t||c|m 23:38, 7 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment ===Weimar Economics===
Reason Julian Malt 00:00, 8 February 2006 (UTC)I feel that the first essay, having been innapropriately titled, has every right to be re-submitted to the archive with a more suitable name. If you would like to provide a more justifiable reason for why it should be deleted please do so. However, i fell that this will be in vain as it is a very good essay. Please note that this is a serious point![reply]
- Comment here here
- No original research. WP:V Ardenn 00:14, 8 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per WP:NOR. Succinct. --Kinu 00:45, 8 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep it looks reference ready. -- Marvin147 06:04, 8 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete as written, delete as original research. OhNoitsJamieTalk 08:16, 8 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep assuming it is factual, with a few citations and cleanup of prose, wouldn't this be the kernel of a proper article? If it isn't factual, someone should *edit* it rather than delete it. The NOR command is not a substitute for just adding citations. If someone(s) have the idea to do it, they should. Carlossuarez46 00:26, 10 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.