Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Webmama

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was delete. Mailer Diablo 00:11, 11 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Webmama[edit]

It's a PR piece, PROD contested by article writer. FCYTravis 01:17, 6 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Non-notable, non-encyclopedic PR ranting. Kevin 01:27, 6 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as spam-vert. -- MarcoTolo 01:44, 6 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - non-notable, advert spam vanity - Richardcavell 02:34, 6 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Advertisement. Wikipedia is not a place to advertise. Funnybunny (^talk/_QRVS) 03:11, 6 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, first notability, then Wikipedia. -- ReyBrujo 04:59, 6 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per Richardcavell --AbsolutDan ^(talk) 05:19, 6 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per Richardcavell. DarthVad e r 09:10, 6 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as the above. Interesting, but non-notable. Jude (talk,contribs,email) 09:24, 6 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete spam. --ManiF 09:24, 6 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
'Delete nn + spam. — G a rykirk | ^talk! 17:18, 06 May 2006 17:18, 6 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Delete spam. Fnarf999 19:01, 6 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, with a side dish of spam. per nom. Buchanan-H e rmit™..SCREAM!!!.... 23:52, 6 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as per above. User:Mikereichold | User_talk:Mikereichold 00:01, 7 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Ad spam. Rense 19:57, 7 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.