Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Webb Miller

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Keep non-admin closure. TonyBallioni (talk) 00:34, 31 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Webb Miller[edit]

This article asserts notability but doesn't really show it. Unless notability shown, delete. --Nlu (talk) 17:49, 25 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Delete fails notability tests such as WP:PROF. Like most college lecturers, has written one or 2 things, but not broken out from the norm.Obina (talk) 21:38, 25 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Seems notable for BLAST. Seems a frequent collaborator and co-author with Eugene Myers. I added some titles to the article. I would say that he meets the barest threshold of WP:BIO. --Alfadog (talk) 16:29, 26 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. —David Eppstein (talk) 07:26, 29 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. A Google scholar search shows, besides a truly ridiculous number of citations to BLAST, many other highly cited works. This is a level of academic impact well above the average professor and I think should be enough to pass WP:PROF #3 and #4. He has also received recent popular press attention (including in National Geographic and the Times of India) for some research involving mammoth DNA, and a broader search finds newspaper coverage of some of his other research as well. —David Eppstein (talk) 07:36, 29 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - Without having to do anything other than read the article as it stands, I note that BLAST is highly, highly notable--what percentage of biologists today use it? It's astoundingly high, I'm sure. Moreover a regular collaborator with Gene Myers is likely notable. --Lquilter (talk) 08:13, 29 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. Even someone who's in the least prestigious spot on the list of BLAST authors is notable without any doubt. --Crusio (talk) 11:22, 29 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
keep per Crusio. Pete.Hurd (talk) 06:26, 30 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.