Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/We the Kings
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was speedy keep; meets WP:MUSIC. PeterSymonds (talk) 14:11, 31 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
We the Kings[edit]
- We the Kings (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
Fails WP:MUSIC and has putative COI issues. Selket Talk 05:09, 31 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Speedy Keep they have charting singles and meet WP:MUSIC criterion #2 (you only have to meet one, not all of the criterion). I see no obvious COI violations in the Revision history Doc StrangeMailboxLogbook 05:20, 31 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep per Doc Strange. Check Yes Juliet was an iTunes Single of the Week, if that helps too. Maxamegalon2000 05:58, 31 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Unfortunately not, check out WP:CHART. Esradekan Gibb "Talk" 07:39, 31 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep, meets WP:MUSIC#C2. I'm assuming the nom just missed it, since the references were already on the page before the AfD tag was added. Esradekan Gibb "Talk" 07:39, 31 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Speedy Keep As the arguments above show, the claim of failing WP:MUSIC is not correct. Also, I cannot see COI problems and even if one or more contributers were in COI while writing, the article does not show it. So#Why 09:00, 31 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.