Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/We As Human

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Ron Ritzman (talk) 01:17, 2 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

We As Human[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

With only one release on a major label, and an EP at that, they do not meet WP:BAND. No notable musicians. No notable tours. No other criteria. Walter Görlitz (talk) 20:29, 17 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:32, 18 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 01:17, 24 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, name is tough to Google (kept getting stuff with "We as human beings…") but searching with various keywords found no reliable source coverage. Ten Pound Hammer • ^{(What did I screw up now?)} 18:24, 24 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Do Not Delete * , Fact is that they are signed with a major label, and have recently wrapped up the "noteable" Winter Jam 2012 Tour in the company of several noteable bands. ( http://www.jamtour.com/ ) As musicians, they are just starting getting a start in the industry, who was "noteable" in the infancy of their careers? Respectfully, I don't see any real merit in the previous arguments to delete. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 99.141.234.12 (talk) 14:47, 30 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Being just signed to a label does not make notable. Touring lacks coverage. Charts are not WP:GOODCHARTS. Coverage lacks significant talk about them by independent reliable sources. duffbeerforme (talk) 07:45, 1 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Coverage to date (that I've found, at least) does not appear significant; perhaps this group will soon meet WP:GNG or WP:BAND, but I don't believe they have at this time. Gongshow ^Talk 23:56, 1 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.