Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/WeWorked.com

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Mark Arsten (talk) 20:22, 21 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

WeWorked.com[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Article about a web-based application. Only one independent source is available, providing minimal coverage of the subject. Fails WP:NSOFT. - Mr X 20:16, 6 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. - Mr X 20:18, 6 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Websites-related deletion discussions. - Mr X 20:18, 6 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Added second independent source to article. --Tz718 (talk) 21:36, 6 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, czar · · 07:02, 14 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - The PC Mag award is pretty trivial, and the coverage in that source is basically non-existent. The MakeUseOf source appears to be quite a long way from a RS. I couldn't see anything else of particular note in a Google search. Article creator appears to be an SPA here just to edit things involving the subject of the article. Lukeno94 (tell Luke off here) 08:49, 14 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.