Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Wavenis
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was no consensus. Stifle (talk) 10:55, 3 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Wavenis[edit]
- Wavenis (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
A wireless connectivity technology. Not even any assertion of notability. — RHaworth (Talk | contribs) 16:24, 19 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete: Fails WP:N. I notified the article creator of the discussion. Schuym1 (talk) 03:00, 20 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Help: I understand that I made an error in submission, what I don't understand is what I did wrong and what I need to do to correct it. Thank you in advance for help. Geoffreyriggs1234
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Technology-related deletion discussions. -- the wub "?!" 23:41, 20 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, — Aitias // discussion 00:00, 24 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, MBisanz talk 01:41, 29 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Insufficient notability. Creator can request userfication if they want to work on it. ChildofMidnight (talk) 19:20, 29 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep actually has plenty of references from third parties, so is notable. THis includes articles in accademic journals, and applications in medicine and home appliances. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 00:38, 30 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, MBisanz talk 02:42, 3 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.