Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Watermark Books and Café

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Mark Arsten (talk) 04:32, 10 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Watermark Books and Café[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Unsourced article about a company with no evidence of notability. The parent company's notability (if it exists) does not confer notabilty onto the subject of this article. Fails WP:ORGDEPTH. - Mr X 22:53, 21 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:26, 22 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:26, 22 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Delete fails WP:ORG. coverage is sorely lacking. LibStar (talk) 05:27, 22 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, SarahStierch (talk) 01:07, 28 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, SarahStierch (talk) 01:15, 5 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. I don't see anything on Google News, and the article isn't much help. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 01:34, 5 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.