Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Waterhead

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was DELETE. -Doc ^ask? 00:49, 6 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Waterhead[edit]

Delete - Dicdef of term that "has not yet found its way into accepted dictionaries". Does not seem to be a term that people use or have used. Wickethewok 02:22, 30 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Delete may even be a hoax - CrazyRussian talk/contribs/email 03:51, 30 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Merge/redirect to Hunter S. Thompson real phrase, nn outside of his usage however. —porg es_(talk) 06:44, 30 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom. Kimchi.sg 07:46, 30 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Looks like a hoax. --Srik e it^{(talk ¦ ✉)} 00:16, 1 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, if not a hoax, then a dicdef --Deville (Talk) 02:47, 1 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Merge and Redirect per Porge. -- ReyBrujo 17:29, 1 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Comment to three probably a hoax votes: Google it and see, it's not a hoax =) —porg es_(talk) 21:57, 1 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Delete if it hasn't even been in modern dictionaries, why would it be here? or wiktionary? wtf... M1ss1ontomars2k4 02:09, 5 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.