Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Watercoolerization

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. ffm is now L Faraone 22:30, 20 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Watercoolerization[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

non notable neologism WuhWuzDat 19:33, 14 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. One lonely Google hit shows this not to be a notable term. —Largo Plazo (talk) 19:59, 14 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as something made up. Polarpanda (talk) 20:44, 14 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete "Coined by Jesper Engsted at the beginning of the millennium." Yeah, and people stopped "gathering around the water cooler" long before the beginning of the millennium. If Jesper is ever deemed notable enough for his own article, this word can get mentioned in his bio. Mandsford (talk) 21:17, 14 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: Per WP:NEO. Joe Chill (talk) 21:34, 14 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per all of the above, or redirect to scuttlebut. Bearian (talk) 22:54, 14 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Per WP:NEO. Warrah (talk) 03:32, 15 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per the above. You know, a redirect to Scuttlebutt might not be a bad idea, given the origins of that term. But it's a minor thing. UltraExactZZ ^Said~ Did 20:45, 18 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.