Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Water infection

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep‎. There is no need to come to AFD and have a week-long discussion when you are really looking for a second opinion. Just go talk to another editor or pay a visit to the Teahouse which is not just for new editors. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 01:15, 17 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Water infection[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I created this, but not sure if this term deserves its own disambiguation page. Thoughts? GnocchiFan (talk) 00:04, 10 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Disambiguations-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 00:39, 10 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Keep - water infection is a common term, especially in the UK, for a urinary tract infection and a bladder infection. Not sure if 'contaminated drinking water' is referred to as a water infection so much as the source of a water infection but I think as a disamb page, this is okay. Kazamzam (talk) 15:37, 10 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Keep: half a million GSearch hits suggest this is a common search term, and DAB pages don't need much more than that to justify their existence. GnocchiFan, you've created a useful page; no reason for you to second-guess yourself. Owen× ☎ 23:37, 11 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.