Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Water and Woods Field Service Council

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was merge to Michigan Crossroads Council. The article's subject is found to lack the notability required for a stand-alone article. — Coffee // have a cup // beans // 01:33, 12 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Water and Woods Field Service Council[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Does not meet the criteria of WP:GNG, namely "a topic has received significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject, it is presumed to be suitable for a stand-alone article or list" AusLondonder (talk) 22:29, 4 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Merge into parent article per Scouting WPMOS.--Kintetsubuffalo (talk) 06:33, 6 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
I take it that Districksyou mean Michigan Crossroads Council. I agree about Merge. We do not go below a certain level of administration and I think even Councils in the USA may be smaller than Scout Counties in the UK and we do not go that far there, sticking at Regions which are not even Scout administrative structures. In Australia we stick at the State level not Scout Districts. So I think this is a clear merge. --Bduke (Discussion) 07:43, 6 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Merge if this is questionably notable. SwisterTwister talk 02:27, 10 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.