The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. - Mailer Diablo 10:08, 6 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Non-notable neologism. Google brings up nothing related. Crystallina 03:40, 1 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom. The article doesn't seem to have done a good job defining it, which seriously challenges its notability. BigHaz 03:44, 1 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
