Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Wassim Rasamny

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 23:37, 23 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Wassim Rasamny[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Obvious vanity piece, without a single actual source (although the reference list looks impressive at first glance, every "source" is actually to his own website or that of his companies, other than this one which just names him in passing as one of the organisers of an auction. ‑ Iridescent 15:21, 16 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as nom. I don't really understand wht my csd was removed; it's a textbook example of a vanity article.TheLongTone (talk) 15:23, 16 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as nom. I would also like to add that this article does not pass the WP:GNG criteria because there is no "significant coverage" of this subject from reliable and independent sources. -KAP03(^{Talk • Contributions}) 15:35, 16 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. Everymorning (talk) 16:05, 16 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as nom. References are junk. Easily fails WP:GNG. David.moreno72 10:45, 17 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - we have usually deleted articles about producers and investors. There's nothing in the article to suggest that the subject is anything more than a run of the mill business person. We are a charity and not a webhost for businesses. In fact, charities such as Hostelling International-Canada have lost charity status due to hosting for profit. Bearian (talk)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.