Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Washington Home and Garden Magazine

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. j⚛e decker ^talk 15:30, 11 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Washington Home and Garden Magazine[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable local magazine, fails Wikipedia:NMAGAZINE ukexpat (talk) 16:45, 20 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Delete One hit in Newsbank, mentioning that the subject of the article used to work there, and that's from examiner.com anyway. No hits in gbooks other than Wikipedia generated content and a couple of passing mentions. Fails Wikipedia:NMAGAZINE as noted by nominator, although that's just an essay. Fails all other possibly relevant notability criteria as well.— alf laylah wa laylah (talk) 17:01, 21 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Maryland-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:43, 23 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Virginia-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:43, 23 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Washington, D.C.-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:43, 23 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Literature-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:43, 23 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Websites-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:44, 23 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, NorthAmerica¹⁰⁰⁰ 03:36, 3 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Delete It an be hard to tell about magazines, but in general this particular sort of local publication is rarely notable. DGG ( talk ) 01:06, 11 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.