Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Washington D.C. Temple Orchestra

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. North America1000 11:07, 5 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Washington D.C. Temple Orchestra[edit]

Washington D.C. Temple Orchestra (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Sounds like the sort of thing that should be getting coverage. Unfortunately I could only find a few passing mentions such as this one: http://ww2.somdnews.com/stories/11252009/indytop102030_32181.shtml Mark Schierbecker (talk) 21:45, 12 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions. North America1000 23:50, 12 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Washington, DC-related deletion discussions. North America1000 23:51, 12 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. North America1000 23:53, 12 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Davewild (talk) 07:14, 20 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, — Yash! (Y) 15:15, 27 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  • delete nn without prejudice to recreation when notability increases. Staszek Lem (talk) 18:35, 27 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete - Multiple searches (News and Books) found nothing aside from another passing mention here. You would think this would've gotten more attention but it is an all-volunteer religious group so that's not a guarantee. SwisterTwister talk 17:44, 30 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.