Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Warwick Hutchings

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. --BDD (talk) 22:29, 13 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Warwick Hutchings[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Not notable. Lacks coverage in multiple independent reliable sources. One of a glut of articles on seemingly non notable St Peter's College old boys. Wikipedia is not a webhost for a collection bios of a schools former students. duffbeerforme (talk) 09:45, 6 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as not notable, just a run-of-the-mill civil servant/public servant. None of the positions he's held are sufficient for notability (even ambassadors/High Commissioners aren't automatically notable and he was only a deputy); many of the sources are from non-professional or non-independent sources (e.g. school magazine, directory, journal of minor organization) and the rest don't look like significant coverage; much of the content, e.g. school prizes, is of interest only to Hutchings' family and his alma mater. --Colapeninsula (talk) 15:35, 6 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of New Zealand-related deletion discussions. Northamerica1000^(talk) 01:50, 7 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. Northamerica1000^(talk) 01:50, 7 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bilateral relations-related deletion discussions. Northamerica1000^(talk) 01:50, 7 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Some minor mentions in Google Books as press secretary. Nothing in Trove. Nothing in a Google search of ("Warwick Hutchings" site:.nz). -- Green Cardamom (talk) 22:18, 9 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.