Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Warrior diet

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Tone 14:07, 21 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Warrior diet[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This is a non-notable fringe diet. I pruned some unreliable sources, the only one remaining is a clickbait-heavy site stuffed with advertorial for supplements and fad diets, albeit alongside legitimate content. Guy (Help!) 21:43, 14 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Weak Delete - The topic was discussed by Washington Post in 2012. Other than that, I can't find any other reliable sources except for Blogs and Tabloids. Yoshiman6464 ^♫🥚 02:19, 15 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Weak Keep - I could see someone looking up the diet and benefitting from a concise summary on Wikipedia. Jeff Quinn (talk) 18:40, 15 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

That sounds like WP:USEFUL. Any good sources to add? Guy (Help!) 23:55, 15 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Weak Delete - until and unless a notable mention surfaces. Good work running all this down, btw. Kortoso (talk) 00:11, 17 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
delete' i looked for sources and there is a lack of significant discussion in RS - see Talk:Warrior_diet#sources. There are lots of bloggy, poor sites.Jytdog (talk) 00:38, 17 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

You have destroyed the page in days! https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Warrior_diet&type=revision&diff=759182327&oldid=759181405 is what it used to look like. Congratulations for that. This is what Wikipedians do - take other people's work and trash it. And why? Because it is so much easier to destroy work than write it, and Wikipedia doesn't have to pay for people's time, and Wikipedians always think they know best. It's a fair bet that all the people meddling with the page in the last few days and the people above saying DELETE! haven't actually bothered to obtain a copy of the book to see what it says. You won't feel the need! That would be too logical. Just rewrite the page, as a prelude to deleting it after you've made the page look rubbish. What's your actual agenda here? To steal the guy's ideas on intermittent fasting? 5.150.92.82 (talk) 13:54, 17 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.