Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Warm (The Lettermen album)

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep‎. Daniel (talk) 03:48, 18 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Warm (The Lettermen album)[edit]

Warm (The Lettermen album) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable album Jax 0677 (talk) 15:25, 10 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

  • Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 15:56, 10 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep. Album by a famous band and important influence (listen to the Beach Boys). Such articles are commonly kept, or if not, should be. Explain how deleting the article would improve the experience of readers searching on this term. Herostratus (talk) 01:23, 11 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
    • Reply - Per WP:V, "Even if you are sure something is true, it must be verifiable before you can add it". --Jax 0677 (talk) 14:55, 11 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
    • Fair point, but that applies to material we adding to the article. When discussing the content or fate of articles among ourselves, we have a lot more leeway to offer opinions and claims without having to necessarily provide sources. For instance, we should absolutely not put in their article that they influenced the Beach Boys (until we have a good source saying that), but it's very likely true IMO, and that matters when deciding how important they are. Herostratus (talk) 00:49, 13 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep major and historical band, hope that no other Letterman albums have been blanked or deleted on the basis similar to this nom. We don't expect albums of this vintage to have the same amount of current sources as 2023 releasses. In ictu oculi (talk) 09:46, 11 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
    • Reply - I think their compilation album was redirected. --Jax 0677 (talk) 14:56, 11 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
      @Jax 0677 I assume you're using this as an argument to delete this album. Not a strong argument. If in doubt, consider restoring it and bring it to AfD and see what happens. ~Kvng (talk) 14:50, 14 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep adequate coverage in music trade magazines. A bit more work and referencing required and it should easily meet the requirements. Karl Twist (talk) 08:10, 13 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.