Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Warheads (confectionery)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Sandstein 19:57, 5 December 2006 (UTC)

Warheads (confectionery)

Warheads (confectionery) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

Contested speedy. Non-notable by WP:CORP criteria. Bringing it here. Denni ^talk 23:47, 29 November 2006 (UTC)

• Keep. Well-established candy that has built significant name-recognition in the 30+ years since it was first introduced. Merging article with a (dare I say less-notable?) parent company that has owned the brand for less than two years would be counter-productive. -- Antepenultimate 03:14, 30 November 2006 (UTC)
• Keep. The article is about the confectionery itself, not the parent company. The fact that the parent company is NN by WP:CORP is irrelevant to this AfD. If there's a problem with the parent company's notability, the AfD should be for Impact Confections instead. WP:CORP is only appropriate for corporations, not confectionery items. Mister Pe 04:35, 30 November 2006 (UTC)
• Delete. Please read WP:CORP more carefully: there is also a section about products, so the nom is correct.

• Comment: Since this article went to AfD, I have expanded upon it and cited two independent sources for my information. I believe it now adheres quite nicely to the notability guidelines set out by WP:CORP's Products & Services section. -- Antepenultimate 21:26, 30 November 2006 (UTC)
• Comment: You're right, and I think it fits the Products and Services section, point 2. Thanks to Antepenultimate, there are now references showing this as well. The rest of WP:CORP doesn't apply, though.Mister Pe 22:38, 30 November 2006 (UTC)

• Keep. - Notable brand of confectionery. --TheSeer (TalkˑContribs) 21:20, 1 December 2006 (UTC)
• Keep, though article needs clean-up - no need for a detailed list of all flavours and products. A link to the product website would be better and more frequently updated. WMMartin 15:25, 5 December 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.