Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Wargame: Red Dragon

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Mark Arsten (talk) 04:27, 14 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Wargame: Red Dragon[edit]

(Find video game sources: "Wargame: Red Dragon" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · JSTOR · free images · free news sources · TWL · NYT · WP reference · VG/RS · VG/RL · WPVG/Talk)

Upcoming computer game. Deprodded by the User:Callanecc who thinks there's enough coverage to make this notable. I still disagree - there are few mentions but outside [1] not much is really mainstream - but we could userfy this and restore after release. _{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 18:16, 6 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Delete for now. The thing is, it's going to be notable. But, strictly speaking, it currently fails WP:GNG with no multiple, reliable, independent, in-depth sources. There are no reviews or critical commentary, because the game is not released yet. Its preview content has gotten mentions, but mostly due to the topic. Most other stuff is interviews, press releases, teasers -- your usual PR hype. Yes, it has "lots of hits", but none of that is in-depth as it can very rarely be in principle for an unreleased product. — HELLKNOWZ ▎TALK 20:39, 6 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of video game-related deletion discussions. (G·N·B·S·RS·Talk) ★☆ DUCKISPEANUTBUTTER☆★ 12:39, 8 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.