Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/War of 1812 bicentennial
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. — Aitias // discussion 22:54, 3 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
War of 1812 bicentennial[edit]
- War of 1812 bicentennial (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
Unneeded crystal ballery article that lists what day the bicentennial will be for some events in the war of 1812. If someone can add, they can find the dates on War of 1812 and anything to do in celebration of that is a violation of WP:CRYSTAL. Tavix (talk) 23:31, 29 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete I'm not sure exactly what this article is trying to be, even. Maybe it will be notable once events planned for the bicentennial are covered by independent sources. We certainly don't need a rehashing of the War of 1812 article. SMSpivey (talk) 23:48, 29 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete nn tourist hype by the state of Maryland or its business community (anything for revenue). It's crystalballism as there's nothing specifically scheduled in a notable way. And...isn't the world supposed to end in 2012 anyway? Carlossuarez46 (talk) 23:54, 29 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of History-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 13:31, 30 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Military-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 13:32, 30 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete without prejudice for recreation, per crystal, adverts etc etc. Ryan4314 (talk) 13:46, 30 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per violation of WP:CRYSTAL. Rosiestep (talk) 18:16, 30 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - textbook example of crystalballism -- Whpq (talk) 18:35, 30 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete -- Much too soon for an article to be needed (if it ever will). Peterkingiron (talk) 15:40, 31 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment Although it's clear that the states of Maryland and Michigan have started thinking about projects, I agree that nothing significant has happened yet. In the case of the bicentennial of the Star Spangled Banner, that's actually going to be 2014. When events are organized, and yes, they will be-- in both the U.S. and Canada-- then it would be great to group them into an article with this title. For now, however, no need to reserve a space. Mandsford (talk) 16:21, 31 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.