Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Wang Sing-nan

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep the subject of the article. Attack revisions go this way. - Mailer Diablo 02:38, 1 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Wang Sing-nan[edit]

Pretty much just a series of unsubstantiated attacks on a Chinese politician, who I assume is real Katharineamy 18:50, 26 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

delete - In addition, is a taiwanese mp notable enough for the english wikipedia? --Rocksanddirt 19:13, 26 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- English Wikipedia is not restricted to covering only topics in Anglophone countries. See Wikipedia:Countering systemic bias. cab 01:42, 27 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. I removed the attack text and flagged the article as a stub. Perhaps the version with the attack text should be removed. As a member of a national legisture, he is automatically notable. --Eastmain 19:27, 26 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. The parcel bomb attack seems properly attributable[1][2]. --Dhartung | Talk 21:02, 26 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Provincial politic elected members no matter where he his, automatically passes WP:BIO.--JForget 01:11, 27 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Keep notable politician. I re-added the content about the mail bomb and cited it to one of the websites provided by User:Dhartung. cab 01:42, 27 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of China-related deletions. -- John Vandenberg 06:52, 27 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.